Apple as distrib only is old music industry. In this new game, streaming is King. By old standards he is Indy. New standards, no.
Bottom line is this… if u view Apple as solely a distributor then he’s independent… if u view Apple as more than that then he isn’t. Simple
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there's nothing about apple that shows them as soley a distributor
-
tell that to my last RT lol
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
they trying to gas chance to diss you bro... Don't cook that man
-
lol I’d never!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Y'all judgment is clouded, If Chance accepts a significant amount of $$$ from a "monopoly" like Apple, independency is lost.
-
I’m so confused about what’s hard to get lol
-
@JoesRage1@dspadz it aint hard to get. Its cognitive dissonance meets brand loyalty. Exactly what the oligarchs want lol - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
if he dropped another album today he would still own it. He just forfeited the rights to 1 body of wrk. Hes still independent.
-
I beg to differ and we’ll see come his next release
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Apple basically is Apple Records since they invented the music market for digital albums.
-
Apple is an entire machine. These folks ain't really thinking it's "just" a distributor.
-
-
Apple is a distributor & also a label. In both, Chance is independent. Freedom is a key to independence. He has not given that up
-
he wasn't free if he let Apple hold the rights to his music for two weeks
-
that is free. He's selling his shit out of his trunk basically for a large price.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.