João Cavalcante

@JoaoLCavalcante

Father, husband and passionate about multimodality imaging. Director, Cardiac MRI, Structural CT and Advanced Imaging Core Lab at Minneapolis Heart Institute.

Minneapolis, MN
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JoaoLCavalcante

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JoaoLCavalcante

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    Seeking an amazing MD/PhD 🩺 or equiv for paid full-time, minimum 1y 🧲💟clinical research w us in Sydney🇦🇺. I will be at SCMR2020. DM me to meet for informal discussion. Application dline March 5, 2020. Pls RT!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 27. sij

    Another great paper by Dr on the association of baseline CT-GLS and outcomes. Going beyond anatomical information adds further value of this important imaging technique!

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    In patients with severe scheduled for aortic valve intervention, an increased ECV% is a measure of left ventricular decompensation and a powerful independent predictor of mortality.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij
    , , i još njih 6
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    . ALWAYS use 3DMPR for MVA calculation. Indeed on-glass measurement underestimate area due to . Short axis 2D tends to overestimate.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    Pearl Jam is back. New single "Dance of the Clairvoyants" available everywhere now: "'Dance' was a perfect storm of experimentation and real collaboration... We’ve opened some new doors creatively and that’s exciting." - Jeff Ament

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Delighted this paper is out! Great collaborative effort driven by Russell Everett. Think it both demonstrates the feasibility of multicenter T1 mapping studies using ECV% and the powerful prognostic information this technique provides.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Extracellular Myocardial Volume in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Beautiful study showing the important prognostic relationship between infarct size and MR severity. CMR has many advantages, probably the most accurate technique to quantify both conditions. Should be used more.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Fantastic Tweetorial and explanation detailing the importance of particularly the severity by MR Fraction and scar burden in cases of

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. sij

    Pleasure to work with and some his mentees on this editorial now available regarding statins for young adults.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij

    and Diastole working together; this State-of-the-Art Review discusses derived diastolic indices including transmitral velocities, DENSE & T1/ECV. Drs. , et al. emphasize a need for widespread adoption.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Very nice paper, Joao and ! Looks like LGE extent has a bigger prognostic role than the severity of MR (if we consider the two in isolation) and there appears to be a synergistic interaction between the two.

    Poništi
  16. 16. sij

    Together our findings highlight the importance to expand the current construct of IMR pathophysiology by integrating CMR in the quantification of IMR and scar. Dr Carabello wrote a great editorial (), strengthening the message for future trial design. Fim!

    , , i još njih 7
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 16. sij

    Recently the conceptual framework of Proportionate vs. Disproportionate MR was proposed to explain the differences between the 2 trials. However, it uses Gorlin equation, assumes MRFrac=50%, lacks clinical validation and doesn't factor in scar size (11/12)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 16. sij

    Lastly, this interaction remained prognostically sound even in the subgroup of patients who received CABG+MVR (n=107). Patients w/ significant IMR (MRFraction>35%) and MIS<15% had survival benefit, whereas those w/ high IMR+high scar (MIS≥30%) didn't do well despite MVR (10/12)

    , , i još njih 3
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 16. sij

    This important interaction between the severity of IMR and extent of MIS was also independently associated with outcomes despite comprehensive adjustments for comorbidities, revascularization, ICD insertion, and surgical MVR as shown below. (9/12)

    , , i još njih 2
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 16. sij

    Furthermore, although one would suppose that increasing scar burden would increase IMR severity, there was no correlation (r=0.04 for entire cohort; r=0.14 for significant IMR). However, more importantly a novel interaction was observed between MRFraction and MIS. (8/12)

    , , i još njih 4
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·