Sir, I read your article about 5 times now. No where do I see an indication of an engagement with medieval sources, or a proper engagement with the secondary literature. I should point out, again, that the medieval data is sparse and absent for many places, across time.
-
-
-
I see some old papers and refuted monographs in your reference list. I also see that you do not acknowledge several areas that were under the influence of the Church within the periods you selected.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I've rarely seen so much conversation without a citation or link.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Data, datasets, sources, all those terms need to be qualified or they are empty husks.
@AdmiralHip is right to make you aware of the important absence of data but it is not good that she had to. -
I see the link to the supplemental, but I did not see an indication that it was where the medieval data was, so I didn’t check it. Someone else informed me incorrectly you used contemporary data last night.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.