JoAnn I AM Bernie2020

@JoAnnIAM_

I AM ruled by 4 dogs, am an avid gardener & food preserver extraordinaire & I can blow bubbles with my spit 11:11

Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JoAnnIAM_

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JoAnnIAM_

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    How propaganda works. Months of media silence about OPCW whistleblowers who revealed how chemical weapons body skewed Douma report to blame Assad. Same OPCW bureaucrats who rigged the report issue new report smearing whistleblowers. Media cite smears as proof of 'nothing to see'

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. srp 2019.

    Why You Shouldn't Support Pete Buttigieg For The Upcoming 2020 Election: a thread

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    One thing is undisputed: Bernie won the most votes in Iowa. He got the most votes in the 1st round, then he got the most votes in the 2nd round. No one else ever led. More people in Iowa voted for Bernie than Pete or Elizabeth or Joe. Period. Bernie won Iowa. Sorry billionaires.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I suspect I can say this without crossing the line into opinion: this is the worst conceived and executed electoral contest I have ever seen

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I’m challenging a moderate, corporate Dem in the 2nd poorest district in all of FL. There are 200,000 registered Dems who don’t typically vote in this primary, we just need to reach them. Can you pitch in to help me raise $2500 by my 25th Bday Friday?

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    Bernie Sanders is as close to a frontrunner as the Dems have right now. For our former nominee to be trashing him on a weekly basis is worse than anything she has accused him of doing to her campaign in 2016.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Deval Patrick is on CNN doing his NH town hall right now. Tulsi hasn't been given a TV town hall by any corporate media network since LAST MARCH and she's demonstrated more support in NH than Deval Patrick by every conceivable metric. Amazingly blatant, malicious marginalization

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Tulsi has also consistently polled ahead of Steyer and Yang in NH, but no matter. Just transparent, corrupt exclusion -- without CNN even bothering to give an explanation

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    DALLAS COUNTY NUMBERS ARE WAAAYYYYYYY OFF!!! HUNDREDS SHOW FOR CAUCUSES AND ZERO BERNIE SUPPORT?!?! I’M CALLING BULLSHIT!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. velj

    It is racist tokenism on the part of CNN to invite Deval Patrick, a neoliberal hack with no chance of winning the nomination & with absolutely nothing to say as the Black diversity candidate. Yet they excluded Gabbard, who I think qualified as a "woman of color."

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 13 sati

    I’m proud of the work our team did in Iowa, and our decisive victory garnering 6,000 more votes than any other candidate. The Muslims satellite caucuses we organized pushed us over the top. Thank you & for making the final push. – mjesto: St. Kilda Surf & Turf

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Remember the Doug Jones/Roy Moore election in late 2017. Do you remember how close the election was? Jones edged out Moore 49.9% to 48.34%. Now, imagine if earlier that day CNN just decided to say Moore won. Now you understand why the IA Caucus media coverage is so fucked.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Imagine if Roy Moore started doing a media tour announcing he won. And CNN just went along with it—as there were still results coming in. Wouldn't you be confused? Your anger at the network would be justified. The term they like to use is "too close to call." But not in Iowa!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    A study by Northwestern University found that Tulsi received by far the most negative coverage of any presidential candidate during a five-month period, while establishment favorite Pete Buttigieg.... was showered with positivity.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    🚨 Bernie 2020 just emailed out their list of discrepancies with the results for a total of 2.50383 SDE 🚨

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    1/3 If the government can change the designation of from being a news organization (Obama Admin’s designation of Wikileaks) to a hostile intelligence agency (Trump Admin’s designation), then…

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 14 sati

    I'm floored that (with 0.1% difference) IDP did not address glaring errors many on here (incl. myself) verified & threaded for them for 24+ hours. NYT wrote a whole piece!! We did the work. It takes mns for them to re-verify. I hope these results are not reported at face-value.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Leading journalists and elections experts have sent the a detailed accounting of glaring errors, and they have so far refused to correct them.

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Isn't it odd when AP was able to declare the winner of California in 2016 before a single vote was cast??

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·