Counterpoint: fuck off
“‘Whistleblower’ must testify under oath and in person”https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/11/05/whistleblower-must-testify-under-oath-jim-jordan-editorials-debates/4169556002/ …
-
-
-
#MolesterProtector Make it trend peeps! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
WHY!? You have MULTIPLE appointed members of the administration confirming a quid pro quo and CLEARLY indicating that POTUS wanted a political favor in exchange for taxpayer money. You are failing your oath of office to bow to your lord emperor rather than serve the people.
-
If whistleblower didn’t exist, would you ignore facts given under oath? Are you that amoral? POTUS asked foreign leader to investigate US citizen NOT under domestic investigation; also happened to be his poltical rival? Do you want to live in a country where this is acceptable?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Speaking of testifying, how go those cases of the young men you didn't protect from being sexually assaulted? Is it weird to know "I was too stupid to see rape directly in front of me" is literally the best excuse you have?pic.twitter.com/N2CKDB5Fe5
-
He's going to hell
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please read Gym, Multiple witnesses, Multiple witnesses, Multiple witnesseshttps://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1191865598650802181?s=20 …
-
Yea Debbie, Gym just doesn't get it. The GOP has changed into a terrible band of liars. Multiple witnesses testified.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right after Trump testifies under oath and in person.
-
Trump could never testify under oath. He is incapable of telling the truth.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.