I think the Committee has heard from 6 first hand sources. Could be mistaken, but I think #6 is testifying as I type this and that would be Mr. Amb. Taylor.
In the complaint, the “whistleblower” says information came from “more than half a dozen U.S. officials.” They supposedly have firsthand knowledge. But it appears we haven’t heard from any of those officials. Why?
-
-
-
Jim was there. He knows. He's gaslighting. Again.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
When President Trump immediately released the phone transcript, the Democrats didn't have time to establish their fake narrative. They couldn't make the whistleblower complaint fit the actual phone transcript which the DOJ recognized as the document of record over anything else.
-
Anyone that disputes the actual phone transcript, doesn't have any credibility.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Again? We are doing this nonsense again? First person source, Trump, ordered the release of official transcript of the call establishing the quid pro quo. The transcript is first hand evidence. How many more sources do you need?https://secure.actblue.com/donate/shannon-4-ohio-committee-1 …
-
I would like the entire phone call, not just his summary of 1/3 of it. That would seal his fate
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The arsonist confessed to burning down the house but the
@GOP wants to know who pulled the fire alarm and who witnessed the fire. -
Best analogy so far!!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe they did talk and you didn’t hear them because they were college wrestlers.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.