Staying silent on abuse? Of course!
Spying? Of course! FBI got a secret warrant to monitor Trump campaign official Carter Page. Was spying justified? Doesn’t appear to be! -Mueller Report: no collusion -Carter Page: not indicted -AND basis for the warrant: the “salacious and unverified” Dossier
-
-
-
Shiny object. Don't look over there...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Basis of the warrant was far more than just the Dossier--which continues to bear out as true. Page was exemplar for FISA--worked for Russian government, ties to Russian spies, unauthorized trip to Russia during campaign to meet senior Russian officials.
-
And I beleive the first FISA application was prior to the Dossier.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Tell me Gym. Does a judge have to sign a warrant to monitor?
-
Prosecutors/investigators must request and present justification for a warrant (we still have a 4th Amenement). The warrant is only as valid as the information presented to the judge. (Hint: you can't misrepresent facts through commission, omission, or *hiding in footnotes*.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think this whole dossier was a scam it was a setup by the Clintons and it was laundered through a Russian company that has some Democrats inside just for the simple reason to leave Russian fingerprints on it and to have somebody to blame for it now these people deserve justice
-
The first 2 words of your post, contradict everything else your saying here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's called investigation. Our Intelligence agencies do that, unlike those without intelligence.
-
he should be concerned they investigate him and the allegations at Ohio State
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.