1/n Several people have wondered why I signed this. Forget the headline; the 7 points make sense even if you think of "China" as an enemy.https://wapo.st/325BS4l?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.ef0ab8128d67 …
-
-
4/n Sen Cruz' hearings about China and US academe cast broad aspersions about ALL Chinese scholars in US; new visa restrictions target Chinese students alone; FBI has circulated a threat awareness document and visited US university campuses telling them to watch out for Chinese
Show this thread -
5/n And there are military-industrial complex forces excited about Cold War with China--they were pumping for it before 9-11 even. But many dangers to Cold Warization of the US-China relationship:
Show this thread -
6/n a) decoupling economies a fantasy, and will help no one (I don't deny tech security issues--Huawei is a problem, this is tough); b) Climate change requires collaboration, not confrontation. Think of the process that brought down cost of solar panels.
Show this thread -
7/n We cannot afford a lengthy Cold War, drummed up by politicians using fear of Other to promote themselves--and this is happening in US as well as by CCP.
Show this thread -
8/n That said, the open letter absolutely should have mentioned Xinjiang concentration camps outright, not buried it in a phrase about "repression of ethnic minorities." That's always been the case--now CCP is embarked on fullscale assimilation of Uyghurs, with Tibetans, HKers.
Show this thread -
9/n There is an implication in the open letter that we should rewind to pre-Trump and all will be okay. To be sure, Trump policy to China is the worst: pulling out of TPP was the greatest gift to CCP imaginable. Weakening relations with our allies, pulling out of UN rights
Show this thread -
10/n bodies, all cede the stage to CCP party-state. Tariffs are clumsy, ill-thought out, self-defeating. And despite Pence speech, Trump admin largely silent on human rights. But rewinding to pre-Trump "engagement" not enough
Show this thread -
11/n New US policy towards China needs to place rights and universal values front and center. XJ, Tibet, HK must be prominent: we've seen that sidelining them doesn't help trade. We should give more love to Taiwan: progressive, democratic, dynamic, tolerant.
Show this thread -
12/n If Trump can arbitrarily slap tariffs on 100s of billions of trade goods, and world doesn't end, future presidents, politicians, social, academic and cultural figures can be forthright about XJ, Taiwan, HK etc. Let CCP fulminate. Our answer is values-based: eg :
Show this thread -
13/n "we like Taiwan. they show a modern expression of sinic culture, but don't feel the need to throw minorities in concentration camps, cut their people off from the world or build Orwellian surveillance systems."
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.