Jim Gettys

@JimGettys

X Window System author, HTTP/1.1 Editor, OLPC software guru, and bufferbloat windmill tilter, embedded system paranoid.

Massachusetts
Vrijeme pridruživanja: prosinac 2010.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JimGettys

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JimGettys

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    12. velj 2018.

    RFC 8290 has issued. My latest blog entry on and its solutions "The Blind Men and the Elephant": . You can take action yourself: "Home products that fix/mitigate bufferbloat"…

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    President Trump was impeached for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. By refusing to call witnesses and compel documents, Senate Republicans have chosen to become accomplices in his cover-up.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Make no mistake: the argument by the President and his lawyers that it is somehow OK to accept assistance from a foreign government is an open invitation to Russia, China, and other adversaries to interfere in future elections.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    This is why it’s legal to rob banks as long as you plan to put the money to good use.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Let's be clear about what this updated argument actually amounts to which is that the president can abuse the powers of his office with a corrupt motive so long as he can come up with any articulated rationale about why it was in the national interest, no matter how implausible.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I don't think people fully grasp the constitutional danger of this moment. If the Senate were to refuse to call relevant witnesses with direct testimony of grave presidential wrongdoing then we can no longer understand impeachment to be a genuine check on executive overreach.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    John Bolton has only until Friday morning to go on TV, tell his story, and thereby try to compel the Senate to hear it—as a majority of Americans are demanding. RETWEET if you want him to get in front of a camera and tell America what he knows.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The President’s lawyers say this is about a “policy debate.” It is not. Unless that policy provides that a president can be as corrupt as he chooses and there is nothing Congress can do about it. That must never be the policy of the United States.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    People who say there was a quid pro quo: 1. Former National Security Adviser John Bolton 2. EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland 3. Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney (later recanted) 4. Special Envoy to Ukraine Bill Taylor 5. Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Let’s imagine it wasn’t Joe Biden. Let’s imagine it was any one of us. Let’s imagine the most powerful man in the world was asking a foreign nation to conduct a sham investigation of us. What would we think about it then? Because next time, it might be.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Just left the secure room having read the classified document regarding VP Pence’s Sept 18 call w Zelensky. 1. Nothing in it is classified. It should be made part of the public record immediately. 2. Hiding evidence of wrongdoing through bogus classification is unacceptable.

    Poništi
  12. 22. sij

    If you build network equipment and software, you should play attention. Sometimes the algorithms are useful in general software contexts as well.

    Poništi
  13. 22. sij

    Dave's passion has been vital for overcoming . Ensure your routers/devices have the new algorithms and your network will be hugely improved. If not, tell your equipment vendor to get their act together.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    So here’s where we are: the Senate GOP won’t subpoena documents from the White House – and won’t subpoena documents from the State Department. If they truly believe in a fair impeachment trial, why are they hiding evidence?

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    202-224-3121 is the number and ask for witnesses and documents. Thank you.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    A classic Russian ploy is to sow division and distrust between natural allies. So when you see overblown outrage trending on Twitter, ask yourself WWPW (what would Putin want) and maybe breathe and let the hashtag pass.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Here's the letter (yes it's Comic Sans) indicating that Rudy Giuliani's associates will not be appearing or providing documents this week. Attorney John Dowd (Trump's former lawyer) argues the timeframe is too short and info could be attorney-client privileged.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. sij

    If our planet was 50% larger in diameter, we would not be able to venture into space, at least using rockets

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Every Senator is accountable to the American people, who overwhelmingly want to see a fair trial. If they refuse, it will be the first full impeachment trial in history with no witnesses. And Americans will remember it for what it was: A cover up.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    In the Clinton impeachment process, 66 witnesses were allowed to testify including 3 in the Senate trial, and 90,000 pages of documents were turned over. Trump was too afraid to let any of his top aides testify & covered up every single document. The Senate must

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. sij

    Dear : Remember when multiple GOP-requested witnesses testified on TV & implicated you? Remember when we invited your lawyers to participate & they declined? Remember when GOP Members asked questions of witnesses on TV? You are the President. Stop making shit up.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·