Conservatives have to argue that it would be ok to enforce the anti-discrimination law for discrimination against interracial couples, but not for discrimination against same-sex couples. Worth remembering here that the objection to interracial marriage was religion, too.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope these deeply unpopular rulings, combined with no Trump in the ballot, will net more dem seats in the midterms. But yes, that’s YEARS from now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When my wife and I chose to adopt our social worker, on first meeting us, said "Oh, you're both women" Then cut the pile of possible adoption agencies down to about 1/5 of the pile She was apologetic, but it was such a gut punch
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
can't we just add a constitutional rider that explicitly reminds people that their freedoms extend to the tips of their fingers and the interface of their skin with the outside world? Like a little asterisk in "Basic Rights for Dummies"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Basic human rights > religious freedoms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is, it seems to me, what discriminatory all-male priesthoods in institutions that get tax breaks established in the first place smh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What happened to separation of church & state?
-
It's under attack by right wing activists, and they've packed the Supreme Court enough to have a chance to prevail
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.