First of all, no. (https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/3033/2019/ and https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab57b3 … and lots of others) Second of all, a rational climate plan treats the next 10-25 years as more important than any fracking proponent seems to.
-
-
-
We will need the natural gas to generate electricity when weather dependent generators aren’t producing enough power to meet customer demands. Especially if Bernie “I never met a nuclear power plant I didn’t hate” Sanders gets his way like with Vermont Yankee.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Not sure either, but I heard methane leakage might make it almost worse than coal. Also if you consider how a technology not only impacts directly on emissions, but also counts indirectly by encouraging longer-term trajectories it might not score so well.
-
Also very situational. In the US net climate impacts may be positive, even accounting for future lock-in. In the UK, absolutely not ...
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
In the U.S.? Yes.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Not really. Fugitive emissions make it very unfriendly, not counting land clearing and othe collateral impacts.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
There's also the fact that it's allowing extraction of previously impractical oil reserves. We'd have reached peak extraction by now without it.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.