Kathy Cady's a zealous advocate for her clients. She's also filed versions of this motion in multiple cases. Each has been slapped down by a judge with minimal discussion. Not understanding the "gasp!" factor here.https://twitter.com/LACountyADDA/status/1407480692577947648?s=20 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @JamesQueallyLAT
The “gasp!” factor is related the alleged statements made by Ms Blair in court and her treatment of the victims. The recall narrative is literally saying Gascón is “on the side of criminals” which seems like hyperbole, but the quotes the motion are an illustration of that claim.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @socallegaleagl1 @JamesQueallyLAT
I think the gasp factor is in the detective’s declaration, which btw DDAs have seen her do the same on other cases. Why is talking to the defendant’s mom and not the victim? Why is she telling the defendant’s mom, not to worry, her son will get out? This is a problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Why do you assume she hasn't talked to the victim? Because of your assumption that gascons team doesn't care about victims. Which is a double-edged bad assumption
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Bc the victim complained about it, hired an Atty, & there is a declaration from a detective. It’s really crazy - you don’t believe the detective, the victim, the Atty for the victim, or other prosecutors that have seen her do the same thing. Why do you assume it didn’t happen?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Depends on what is meant by being "allied with the defendant"? Perhaps the detective and other district attorneys aren't used to someone from the prosecution side having any semblance of thought for those on both sides of the aisle. This is not an ethical rules violation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ignorant tweet. Both SF and LA have prosecutors that, not only have defense experience, but some have convictions of their own and some have even spent time in custody and this predates
@GeorgeGascon@LADAOffice and@chesaboudin@SFDAOffice1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @socallegaleagl1 and
Mel. U are lost. You talk about an ignorant misguided tweet. Are you for real? A motion could be filed that challenges the credibility of any prosecutor who had a criminal record or served jail time. All his or her cases could be thrown out and sentences vacated.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JesseJe99650584 @socallegaleagl1 and
You don’t know what you’re talking about. I don’t mean it offensively, but you just don’t. I can explain how moral character, criminal convictions, etc work w the State Bar and then explain how that affects cases, but I don’t think you’re trying to learn or understand tbh.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
The problem here is the sheriff departments detective involved and the deputy district attorneys disagreement with juveniles under-17 not being prosecuted as an adult under gascons policies. They believe a 17 year old should go to prison for 50 years to life. Not till age 25
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.