Medijski sadržaj
- Tweetovi
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj, trenutna stranica.
-
So Tim Scott has consistently said the call was *not* perfect.pic.twitter.com/CaHraQ5ZyJ
-
S&P 500 - 10 Year Daily Chartpic.twitter.com/SlW8LvbzDg
-
-
It’s hard to think of a bigger waste of a POTUS’s time than spending his morning trying to get anti-Pelosi hashtags going. Except for doing so and still having this be the result:pic.twitter.com/lP5LUHDIDl
-
White House Lawyers: It’s outrageous for the House to say Trump just fought all subpoenas. Trump: “We’re fighting all the subpoenas.”pic.twitter.com/GyyFN4rRS4
-
-
As Trump goes through an extremely long list of thanking Senators who had virtually nothing to do with what he's signing, he jokingly-but-not-jokingly acknowledges why. "Maybe I'm being just nice to them because I want their vote, does that make sense?"pic.twitter.com/RmY5fJ8vwL
-
Mick Mulvaney sounds like a Republican witness to me. They don’t want him?pic.twitter.com/gmanitHPD7
-
Amazing to watch White House lawyers trying to explain how this is "not blanket defiance," it just happened to order every single witness not to appear, and every single document withheld.pic.twitter.com/juwCjeLgrQ
-
Ken Starr in his book, "Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation," on Abuse of Power: "The reaction of the abuse-of-power skeptics –including Republican members of the House-surprised me. This wasn’t an obscure legal doctrine. This is what had brought Nixon down."pic.twitter.com/xEB83ODnOW
-
Rucker on his & Leonnig’s new book, reporting Trump’s desire to repeal laws forbidding bribery in foreign countries by US companies. “There’s a common thread that this is a President who doesn’t care about corruption, either abroad or in his businesses, or in his Administration”pic.twitter.com/deLIPfpbEc
-
To accept Trump’s defense means: Presidents have a right to abuse their power. Congressional subpoenas are meaningless. It’s Ok to ask a foreign country to investigate your political opponent. Lankford: “I think he is asking for an investigation as you would for anyone else”pic.twitter.com/zzNv4zN3Af
-
Third straight poll I’ve seen with 50+ for removal. A shocking state of affairs. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-record-economy-ratings-as-half-say-senate-should-remove-trump …pic.twitter.com/eP7iMEzy4Z
-
Watch Schiff's debunking of Trump's "executive privilege" smokescreen, noting that "We have a very capable justice sitting in that Senate chamber empowered by the Senate..." to decide such issues. Also notes many witnesses & documents have "no even colorable claim of privilege."pic.twitter.com/httO8z054i
-
Schiff: "The president and his allies have offered no explanation for this effort except that the President can abuse his office all he likes, and there's nothing you can do about it."pic.twitter.com/W6Nc0R3OZu
-
Brutal. GOP witness in the House, Jonathan Turley, destroys both key White House legal arguments. "The White House is arguing that you cannot impeach a president without a crime. It is a view that is at odds with history & the purpose of the Constitution." https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/21/where-trump-defense-goes-too-far/?utm_campaign=wp_opinions&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter …pic.twitter.com/T99t9GG7nB
-
Ken Starr on Clinton: “The administration justified its many privilege claims by claiming an interest in protecting the presidency, not the president personally. But… Presidents Carter and Reagan waived all government privileges at the outset of criminal investigations..."pic.twitter.com/tBgXDI0Ksn
-
Here is Alan Dershowitz of the Trump trial team in 2017, debunking the White House argument on obstruction: "Congress is an independent branch of government and they have the right to subpoena... Congress has the absolute power to compel him to turning these materials over."pic.twitter.com/F0lZcg75g3
-
Must-watch. Trial will be educational for many.
@GStephanopoulos: Setting aside whether you think it's an impeachable offense, do you think it was proper for the president to solicit foreign interference in our election? Sen Shelby: I don't know that has actually been proven...pic.twitter.com/9g2y7oSNHm
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.