It's silly to say we have a single, monolithic "Deep State," but you don't have to be a Trump partisan to find it dangerous & unsustainable for a significant segment of the intelligence & national security bureaucracy to be dedicated to taking down the Commander-in-Chief.
-
-
Correct.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure how this excuses leaking POTUS phone calls to press
-
Their mind, since it’s Trump’s calls it’s okay to leak them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who sets foreign policy in the Constitution, Jeryl, the President or intelligent community?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What in the COTUS is being protected here?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The process began long before his election, and is itself inconsistent with the constitution
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The basis for all this as far as I can tell is that liberals in the IC - who thought Hillary Clinton was fit to be POTUS (WHY?) - have sincerely convinced themselves that Donald Trump could never be. And they can’t tell you why. It may be genuine, but it’s also irrational.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Um, no. Every indication is that its political. If it were constitutional concerns, there are courtrooms for that.
-
That, I agree with. I don't see anything illegal here. What is at issue is abuse of power.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I can’t-it seems too coincidental that this comes so soon after the Mueller report fizzles.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.