Jeromy Anglim

@JeromyAnglim

Academic in Australia bridging statistics and psychology. Post about , Stats, Bayes, I/O psych, open science, and more.

Melbourne, Australia
Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JeromyAnglim

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JeromyAnglim

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    “A new ranking system [by ⁦⁩] for academic journals measuring their commitment to research transparency will be launched next month -- providing what many believe will be a useful alternative to journal impact scores.”

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    "You just have to Google smartphone addiction and you’d be convinced that it is a thing, even though it is not a psychiatrically recognised disorder. To talk about smartphones affecting the brain is a really slippery slope"

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    I've been looking for a correct definition of p values in textbooks... and no wonder everyone has trouble with this. Most of the definitions are straight up wrong. Here follows a list of incorrect examples:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    In this entry of Opening Up – a column on The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist devoted to all things open science – I offer up a primer on open science to IO psychologists (). [1/6]

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    jamovi 1.2.2 now ships with the latest R version 3.6 for all it's analyses and modules, including the Rj editor! For more info about module development or directly coding with R in jamovi:

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "New approaches are shedding light on the magnitude of sex differences in personality and the results are so strong and pervasive that they can no longer be ignored." My latest article for (been working on this one awhile trying to get it right):

    Poništi
  7. 22. sij

    I really wanted to thank and Ingo Zettler for their valuable feedback on an initial draft of this manuscript. This was definitely the biggest project I've been involved with post-PhD. It's great to be able to share it with the world. (15/15 - end)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 22. sij

    All data and scripts are on OSF. This is one of only a few fully-reproducible data scripts available for large meta-analyses. Hopefully, it is facilitates incremental development. There is also potential for further research on this data (14/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 22. sij

    Incremental prediction by facets was modest but meaningful (average proportional increase of around 20% on NEO, IPIP NEO, and HEXACO), although increase on life satisfaction was notably larger (24% for NEO; 47% for IPIP NEO; 51% for HEXACO) (13/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 22. sij

    Short-form personality measures (e.g., 1 to 3 items per trait) have weaker and less differentiated correlations with well-being than standard and long form personality measures. (12/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 22. sij

    Meta-analytic Correlations between Big Five and well-being reinforced the previous meta-analysis of Steel et al (2008) who focused on the NEO. Our findings differed from DeNeve & Cooper (1998), which had to rely on categorising traits into Big Five. (11/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 22. sij

    Something that was not previously known is that correlations between the Big 5 and subjective well-being are largely robust across personality measures (especially NEO, IPIP, BFAS, BFI, and Adjectives). TIPI was the most distinct. (10/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 22. sij

    Facet-level correlates highlighted the unique importance of particular facets (e.g., depression and positive emotions in the Big Five framework and social self-esteem in the HEXACO framework) as well as explaining differences between the HEXACO and Big Five frameworks. (9/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 22. sij

    Correlations with personality mirror unique characteristics of different dimensions of well-being. E.g, strong correlations were observed between openness and personal growth, between conscientiousness and purpose in life, and between neuroticism and negative affect. (8/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 22. sij

    "Whereas (lower) neuroticism is the strongest correlate of well-being within the Big Five framework, extraversion is the strongest correlate within the HEXACO framework. Conversely, conscientiousness is a notable correlate within both frameworks." (7/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 22. sij

    The research confirms that the overlap between basic personality traits and well-being dimensions is substantial. (6/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 22. sij

    Here is a summary of the core meta-analytic correlations of Big 5 and HEXACO personalty with SWB and PWB. (5/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 22. sij

    Literature on personality and well-being has grown dramatically in recent years. (4/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 22. sij

    It is the first meta-analysis of personality and well-being to examine (a) HEXACO personality, (b) Ryff's psychological well-being dimensions, and (c) a broad range of established Big Five measures. (3/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 22. sij

    Freely available post-print is available on "Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: A Meta-Analysis" (2/15)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·