These findings could be seriously biased by how questions where posed @JeromeSegal & @washingtonpost; also seems to assume respondents know/care about "others'" areas. Thus, the conclusion that Trump didn’t end the peace process is dubious. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/no-trump-didnt-end-the-peace-process-by-recognizing-jerusalem/2017/12/08/2e9a6a44-db73-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html …
The definitive proof that our conclusions about the possibility of solving the Jerusalem question by disaggregating were sound, is that Barak, Clinton, Olmert, Abu Mazen and even Arafat were all willing to more in that direction,
-
-
Or they we obligated to. Especially the Palestinians. You have an endogeneity issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.