This is such a deeply wrong, deeply inappropriate, deeply disrespectful thing to say....that I hardly know where to start. 2/
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Start with this: we have no reliable idea of the actual death toll. Reporting of fatalities has broken down. 3/https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/10/2/16392670/puerto-rico-death-toll-trump …
Näytä tämä ketju -
Toll of 16 reflects mostly those killed in the storm or immediate aftermath; number likely to rise are info links are restored. 4/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Operative question here is how many have died during the ensuring response, when they *could have been saved.* We don't yet know. 5/
Näytä tämä ketju -
But the bigger point - EVERY fatal catastrophe is a "real catastrophe", FFS (sorry. don't tweet angry). 6/
Näytä tämä ketju -
The only sense in which Trump's comment is accurate is this: the "real" catastrophe is arguably not the storm, but his response to it. 7/
Näytä tämä ketju -
The initial death toll is the one thing over which he had negligible control. The rest is on him. 8/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Choosing to ignore the response for the first 6 days because tweeting about the NFL was more important? That's on him. 9/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Getting into fights with local authorities rather than figuring out how to best support them? That's on him. 10/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Claiming the response was fine and dandy when most of the island was (and is) without power and water? That's on him. 11/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Taking his eye off the ball while the federal response proved to be too slow, too small, and too late? That's on him. 12/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Assuming an overstrapped FEMA operating without a strong State-level counterpart would be up to the task of this? That's on him. 13/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Foot-dragging on the Jones Act waiver because US shipping interests weren't wild about it? That's on him. 14/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Exhale. Most fundamentally - failing to create a leadership culture in which this response could succeed? That is absolutely on him. 15/
Näytä tämä ketju -
I don't blame FEMA for the inadequate response. Trump has fostered an environment which makes it hard for them to do their jobs. 16/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Crucial to good crisis mgmt: - Strong WH interagency process - Attention to evidence/data - Ability to challenge leadership assumptions 17/
Näytä tämä ketju -
NONE are the case in this WH (as I wrote about back in February, when I saw something like this coming). 18/ http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/donald-trump-master-of-disaster-214848 …
Näytä tämä ketju -
WH-led interagency process remains haphazard and weak. Loren nicely breaks it down here. 19/ https://twitter.com/LorenRaeDeJ/status/915040721505275905 …
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.Näytä tämä ketju -
As I wrote in Feb, that's fatal in a complex disaster response like this. 20/pic.twitter.com/5kRGfV8JLK
Näytä tämä ketju -
Re: evidence, it was clear within 1-2 days of landfall that this was totally catastrophic. But Trump wasn't paying attention to that. 21/
Näytä tämä ketju -
And instead he and his team were maintaining all was swell. And that really, REALLY makes FEMA's job hard. 22/
Näytä tämä ketju -
One of toughest, but most important, things to do in govt is tell your boss he/she is wrong. 100x more so with Trump. 23/
Näytä tämä ketju -
WH culture that spawns "dear leader" cabinet mtg isn't a culture open to telling POTUS the response is off track 24/https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/priebus-cabinet-members-praise-trump-in-first-white-house-meeting/2017/06/12/381bdfe6-4fa3-11e7-b74e-0d2785d3083d_video.html …
Näytä tämä ketju -
So when we needed extraordinary WH leadership that could take a hard honest look at the challenge and mobilize an unorthodox response... 25/
Näytä tämä ketju -
...we got chaotic self-congratulatory leadership where the highest priority is messaging that everything is going totally fine. 26/pic.twitter.com/ZyYv0jhHBU
Näytä tämä ketju -
Now, FEMA and DOD are *really* competent and capable. And they can overcome this in a less complex disaster (e.g. TX and FL went ok). 27/
Näytä tämä ketju -
But when a super complex one comes around - Katrina, Ebola, etc - that forces agencies to do something they weren't built to do... 28/
Näytä tämä ketju -
...Presidential leadership is the make-or-break factor. Puerto Rico is such a crisis. 29/
Näytä tämä ketju -
And with his comments today, POTUS underscores again, definitively, that the critical failing element in this response...is him. /end
Näytä tämä ketju -
PS - apologies for being so long winded. Don't tweet angry.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.


