Good lordpic.twitter.com/vOZAMlR1LQ
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
I just wasted 3 minutes reading this, but I found the intro pretty entertaining. It reads like a 2005 pop sci article on GWAS
Very much looking forward to Murray discovering PCA
I just... how does he think polygenic IQ scores are generated? Does he think there's some deity-provided instruction manual for the genome somewhere that just lays out which the smart genes are without anyone having to take an IQ test?
Ask Watson. He seems to have a lot to say about IQ. Sadly none of it correct.
I can't believe @WSJ did no research on what this "dude" was going to say. I'm in shocked this is even published in 2020 but then again a white woman just touched my hair last week, actually two white women. Society no longer seems to amaze me.
Wtf? That’s super weird. Sorry to know so many people are behaving with no respect for others.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a young science in possession of tools to measure humans, must inevitably be turned to phrenology
Am I right in saying it also fails to acknowledge the possibility that the metrics used to set the scores (IQ measurements) might themselves be flawed, which was part of the problem with previous logic by this author..?
Exactly! Polygenic scores of *what* exactly? (Test results.)
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.