Iowa.
BREAKING: IG REPORThttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-14/comey-broke-from-fbi-procedures-in-clinton-probe-watchdog-finds …
Show this thread
-
IG: Peter Strzok & Lisa Page exchanged anti-Trump texts, BUT “we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed"
Show this thread
“Several FBI employees Who played critical roles in the investigation sent political messages,” IG report says. It cites Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Strzok: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
-
-
This just in: People have opinions and aren't robots. But 1st, we go to the weather.pic.twitter.com/9ofM0ycPZa
-
"we'll stop it" is not an opinion but thanks for that great take
-
Obviously they didn't, so obviously it was.
-
the definition of the word opinion doesn't change based on the success or failure of intended action
-
An "intended action" without any consequent effort is by definition inaction, which far more resembles "opinion" than what you're suggesting. I humbly suggest you get out more, and stop inhaling the conspiracy theory fumes.
-
Not inhaling conspiracy fumes at all. And just because something "far more resembles" a word doesn't mean we get to change the definition of the word entirely!!! I can't say either way whether or not these texts were lighthearted jests or the origin point of a plot because we...
-
don't have enough information but I certainly think it's naive to immediately dismiss the idea that FBI agents were politically motivated to stop a candidate from becoming president simply because people are shouting "CONSPIRACY." I think you're the one drinking the KoolAid
-
There was nothing immediate about my conclusion. This has been floated for awhile now. I've thought long and hard about this whole situation. While I don't know these 2 as well as I know the other players, I stand by my opinion that this is a smokescreen to hide real crimes.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But if they didn't do anything to stop it, then it's just words
-
but we know they did
-
Strohm from Bloomberg News reports that the new IG report to be released in full later today states that Strzok/Page texts did have political bias, but the IG found no evidence that "improper considerations" affected their investigative actions
-
Right. But we already know they vowed to stop him and then magically had cause for a counter intelligence investigation? Come on, Donna. That is not sensible. Strzok was the head of FBI counter intelligence, not just some agent.
-
Exactly. The action was a phony investigation based on evidence they planted and manufactured through their own FBI assets like Halper
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It shows that they knew Trump was compromised. That’s it. They were probably shit scared knowing what they knew. They are human. We’re seeing what Trump is doing now.
-
If Trump was compromised and IC knew it wouldn't just be two agents discussing the prevention of his election. Apply some basic sense here.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe this is my own personal bias, but I find it unsettling that 2 career
@FBI agents sound so terrified at the prospect of@realDonaldTrump being@POTUS -
They threw case against Billary along with Comey
-
Did they? Comey Cited as Insubordinate, but Report Finds No Bias in F.B.I. Decision to Clear Clintonhttps://nyti.ms/2HLq4Jb
-
-
As awesome as that monkey is, I'd love to see the official source you have that shows the bias affected the outcome Otherwise I assume you wouldn't believe a guilty verdict from the biased
@FBI either? -
No, insubordination affected the outcome. He did not follow protocol which is an obvious admission that she received different treatment. You don’t give immunity to one, let alone 5, when you’re not seeking criminal charges
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.