Haha noooo. If you're nutso, sure. Just a whole lot of nothing. Good job Geraldo.
Comey's statement establishes obstruction of justice by Trump. Period.
-
-
-
It's just obstruction of justice. Good thing that's not illegal for the Trumps
-
Haha then guess what 95% of cap hill has obstructed justice.
-
Oh ok. That makes it legal for Trump to do it. Thanks!
-
The point is if you think THAT is obstruction, we're going to need one big as paddy wagon in DC.
-
It is obstruction of justice
-
I'm not sure how else to explain this to you, this isn't obstruction of justice.pic.twitter.com/bgayW8rTkl
- 44 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well, as a legal matter, what happens? A sitting president can't be indicted, right?
-
It could and should be a basis for impeachment. But it wont.
-
34% approval of Trump is still too high for impeachment
-
True dat. R's wont act without a tsunami of public opinion.
-
It might have to be in the teens. Or Ossoff has to win in GA06 this month. Those two factors might tip the scales.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How so? Where did Comey say he obstructed? I feel like you haven't actually read the statement
-
And I feel like u haven't actually read the statute on obstruction of justice...
-
So show me in the statement where the statute would apply
-
Trump's statements about loyalty, insisting on private meetings with Comey, suggesting repeatedly that Comey drop investigation.
-
How much money do you want to put on whether Trump is charged with obstruction based on this?
-
It will take additional evidence, which may be presented. 3) impeachment would require Rs putting country over party, which may never happen
-
So how may dollars is that?
-
Uh, since the premise of your question is totally flawed, it's 0.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.