Training, taken by itself, is a typical example for a frequentist approach! 
Hey Frequentists. Is there Neyman-Pearson bodybuilding? Fisherian bodybuilding? Fiducial Body Building? I don't think so.pic.twitter.com/4ymoKxUAi1
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"I'm actually pretty ripped, if you take into account the base rate"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Frequentist Bodybuilders are occupied with determining whether 0.95 of workouts they could have had, but didn't, contain the true gains.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What distribution is that? Very lumpy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is that not based on increasing your posterior?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Frequentists just do modelling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This can't be real...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too much focus on the Biceps Factor. Long runs are better for the whole body.
-
I never go to the gym. Instead, I just have a really high prior I have an ideal physique ;)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I was using the Neyman-Pearson bodybuilding system but I set the wrong threshold and didn't push with enough power so it had no effect.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.