We can't call @paddyjackson10 a rapist. It would give him grounds to claim defamation or slander.
We CAN call him misogynistic, puerile to the point of dangerous, an upholder of toxic masculinityand simply not a friend to womankind.
And we should. Often. In public.
So a man deemed innocent by the court should be slandered on the street because some unemployed Marxist incel neckbeard didn't like the outcome and virtue signals online in the hopes that some unwashed obese repealer will give him an unenthusiastic hand job if he's lucky. Got it.
-
-
Is it slander to use quotes Jackson literally said? I think you'll find I said we can't call him a rapist. We CAN judge him on words he actually said. Making this nice and simple for you? I can draw a picture perhaps?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
See pic. He said this. In public. However saying things in private as you say makes it no less disgusting,pic.twitter.com/eX8XEM7NF6
-
Tweet unavailable
-
This tweet frightens me because I don't actually feel this is a troll account. I feel it is an account made to make comments but I feel this IS actually your view. Consent should always be verbal.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I think you miss the subtly of knowing. I might not ask my partner DO YOU WISH TO HAVE SEX NOW But I know her. We have talked about consent. And I am now flourished with other ways I know she wants/does not want sex. This would NOT be possible on a first time together drunk basis
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also: Not unemployed. Socialist not synonymous with Marxist (similar granted) I don't virtue signal. If anything I am polemic and raise a lot of backs. On both sides. I love hand jobs. I love fat people. And I don't need to beg for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.