Are you sure you aren’t just applying the no true Scotsman fallacy? I agree with you. But I was disagreeing with the “intactivist” (that said it should be banned completely) to see if I could learn something new here.
-
-
99.6% Of all circumcisions in the West are perpetrated on non-consenting children for no reason whatsoever. Let's just keep that in mind.
-
So you want to ban circumcision and let the other 0.4%’s dicks drop off? That’s quite a lot of people.
-
You're not considering the number of men who literally have their penines cut off in botched circumcisions. Or the infants that bleed out after it. Or who had too much taken and now have pain during intercourse.
-
Just btw, if you really want to quit the debate here I would be pretty grateful. It’s been fun but I pretty much just started this debate to procrastinate on final exam study. Plot twist, I’m only 17. So, although nobody convinced me circumcision should be banned, I enjoyed this.
-
We agree. I think for different reasons, but we seem to have come to the same conclusion.
-
And thank you for not going postal. Usually I get accused of being a pedo who's too interested in baby dick. So that was a nice change.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m using all the what about ifs to demonstrate how it’s not that simple and a circumcision ban is a bad idea. Look, I found this discussion educational and interesting. I enjoyed talking to you, and it seems like we pretty much agree. Good night.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.