@Jayarava I don’t have much quarrel with the norms, but the pretense that they are Buddhist rubs me the wrong way.
-
-
@Meaningness well... Buddhist ethics *do* have a definite content - e.g. pañcasīla, dasakusalakammapatha etc.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@Meaningness The main rationale of Buddhist ethics is to obtain a better rebirth. That is at the forefront especially for laypeople.0 retweets 0 likes -
@Meaningness For full-time meditators it helps to make the mind amenable to concentrated states, culminating in the experience of cessation.0 retweets 0 likes -
@Jayarava Yes… so, in many contexts, “sila” is better translated “pre-meditative practice discipline” than ethics.0 retweets 0 likes -
@Meaningness you may have seen me distinguish between sīla (ethics) and saṃvara (discipline) recently? Quite different.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@Meaningness It's in this one: http://jayarava.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/having-seen-form-with-eye.html …0 retweets 0 likes -
@Jayarava Thanks, yes, I remember now and have re-read. Comports with my general understanding (but not with that of most American Buddhists0 retweets 1 like
@Meaningness It's an ideal, though, conveyed in myth and legend. It's not clear that *anyone* did or does it. Buddhists hate this :-)
-
@Jayarava Yeah, I take to be normative intellectual speculation much stuff that Buddhists want to believe are descriptive practice manuals0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
David Chapman
Jayarava जयरव 勝鳴