@Jayarava Definitely. My gripes are that “Buddhist ethics” is (1) not Buddhist and (2) an OKish but not sophisticated ethics
@Meaningness Groups must have norms however, or they don't cohere and bestow the advantages inherent in groups.
-
-
- View other replies
-
@Meaningness Beware: "Buddhist ethics" is just the ethics practised by Buddhists. There is no universal standard.0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@Jayarava This series is about Consensus Buddhist ethics specifically. That’s indistinguishable from mainstream American leftish ethics.0 retweets 0 likes -
@Meaningness But so what? If that is the ethic that American Buddhists adopt, then that is American Buddhist ethics. Isn't it?0 retweets 0 likes -
@Jayarava I agree with the point in general, but I think there’s a deliberate deception going on this case that needs to be undermined.0 retweets 0 likes -
@Jayarava There’s a huge amount of effort being made to portray “Buddhist ethics” as something special; in particular, it’s >0 retweets 0 likes -
@Jayarava > it’s the special sauce that Buddhism has that the secularists don’t, so you need to buy Buddhism™ brand mindfulness, not secular0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@Meaningness Dude, you just described the entire history of Buddhist literature. This is not a new phenomenon!0 retweets 0 likes - Show more
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Jayarava जयरव 勝鳴
David Chapman