Says the guy w/a profile like yours who did a Bill Maher interview 3 wks ago, now tweeting to your followers abt this study (not some MD listserv). Say what you will abt courting celebrity, I'm no mind reader, but optics being what they are, Dr., seems you doth protest too much.
-
-
-
He is a hero for speaking out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are objectively not a scientist. Your experience in caring for "tens of thousands" of children is marred by egregious error and advice in conflict with your professional organization. Just ask Elisa Jane Scovill. Oh wait. You can't. She's dead.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Eliza_Jane_Scovill …
-
As for your scientist claim, show me where you have contributed to the literature. Not only can I find no evidence you've published on this topic, it's unclear that you've published in the peer reviewed literature. None of these appear to be you. Odd. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Gordon+JN%5BAuthor%5D …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You are definitely not a scientist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How can one claim to be a thing of which they do not know the operating definition?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, care to share any papers you are the main author on? How many papers in total have you been the main author on?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.