Or, ya know, are among just about every expert on the planet and know the evidence of harm is slim to none.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What science is this based on? I'd love to see it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The microscopic amounts that get processed and excreted quickly? https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-ingredients/aluminum …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I interpret it as an incredibly scientifically ignorant statement, actually.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"...aluminum adjuvants are extremely effective at enhancing antibody responses, are well tolerated, do not cause pyrexia and have the STRONGEST SAFETY RECORD OF ANY HUMAN adjuvants. Hence, aluminum adjuvants remain the gold standard...."pic.twitter.com/5xKfKmN40F
-
"...any new adjuvant must prove it provides better protection, tolerability or safety, or preferably all, when compared to aluminum adjuvant. This has proved extremely hard to achieve, explaining aluminum’s ongoing dominance." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615573/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cyanide is harmful but people still eat almonds.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.