I don't see a denial of the actual meat of the story. They just deny that's how they would characterize it.
-
-
-
Why would they say anything then? If its true why not just let it be.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is fascinating. They aren't saying it's entirely wrong. Just not accurate. Lawyers don't misuse words. Especially not Peter 'No-Comment' Carr.
-
I'm having a hard time seeing "not accurate" as anything other than basically "incorrect."
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why did you defame and slander
@realDonaldTrump today? -
*libel
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can you please respond to the fact that the Special Counsel's office is disputing your "characterization of documents and testimony" obtained that office,.
New conversation -
-
-
“Are not accurate” They aren’t saying it’s false. They’re saying it’s not accurate.
-
Could, in fact, be worse than stated.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.