because they care about the fans maybe!!!
Miami was the only dissenting vote though some teams i'm in contact w/in the meeting don't know precisely why MIA voted no
-
-
@NFLonCBS because they're in a city (like Vegas) where football on Sunday doesn't mean SHIT! So they get it. (Face palm) -
Las Vegas offers a direct competition for future Super Bowls. Would never have had a Super Bowl in Oakland otherwise.
-
Stephen Ross owns land near the coliseum site I heard.
-
-
Miami sees Vegas as a rival in getting future super bowls?
- 1 more reply
-
-
Avoiding lawsuits for damages the NFL caused to the cities of St Louis, San Diego and Oakland?
-
I'm shocked it was miami. Figured it would be San Diego that would have voted no
-
from one of my CBS Miami friend's mentions, it's been reported he has a business opening in the Oakland area.
-
why no secret ballots?
-
they have a conscious
-
Stephen Ross hates moving. He won't even move down to Florida where he OWNS a team
-
I guess principles are unfamiliar in that business.
-
-
could be Ross has development near stadium site in Oakland
-
that is great thought it's not because he cares about Oakland or there fans
-
-
Ross is quoted by BANG story from yesterday. He believes teams are a public utility and shouldn't relocatez
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.