Like von Mises he was Jewish; proposed 'knowledge' as an economic resource, adding another layer of tautology onto the already-burdened dismal science, by which speculators every successful move would, by its profit, axiomatically validate itself as socially useful. 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
For Machlup, the secondary market in equities is the Sine Qua Non of capital formation. For without it, how would investors know which were the most valuable channels in which they ought to invest?? But of course the obvious truth, which everyone knows ... 3/
Show this thread -
Is that Investment Capital is itself a SCARCE resource and for every dollar spent on secondary market equities, is not spent on capital formation. Thus the stock market is axiomatically a drain on capital formation. As is clear to us now, it represents a channel through which 4/
Show this thread -
Investors can place their capital without actually endangering it in the illiquidity, the uncertainty, and the scarcity reduction of tangible capital formation; every investors worst nightmare: physical capital. The stock market is precisely the opposite of Machlup's idea. 5/
Show this thread -
Machlup is the inescapable conclusion of Austrian thought. Hayekian Knowledge Economy carried to its logical end. Treating Investment Capital like an unlimited resource in order to produce "Information" rather than "Food" or "Housing". Yes thank you Fritz.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.