with every new dollar they create, there is a corresponding liability thus there is never truly an over-supply its double-entry bookkeeping, going back to Venice or earlier (possibly Babylon) London mastered it, New York was their protege
-
Show this thread
-
most people are never trained to think like a banker, which is good in a way, because usury is a sin, but you cant understand the modern financial world if you dont understand the double (& now triple) ledger system
1 reply 2 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
Austrian Economics was developed during the monetary experimental days of Central Europe (Germany & Austria mostly), where fully fiat paper was actually issued. That was not the Babylon/Venice/London/Fed system. The Austrians simply do not "get it".
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
Inflation is of course possible, yes. But its built in - intentional and within a certain scale. I'm not defending the Fed and bankers at all. Its not a moral system. But most people don't understand it and are perplexed at how it keeping functioning.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
Money in a modern society is a function of law. If there are ;awful debts and/or taxes and people have to pay them then there must be a legally sanctioned way of paying them. That way is the government currency. The system has a built in supply/demand structure that works...
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
.... for as long as the legal system is reliable at enforcing debts and collecting taxes. Every municipality, corporation, county, state, and nearly every individual has dollar-denominated debts that legally must be paid...
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
.... the two main advantages to the bankers are getting to skim off all economic activity with these interest payments, and the ability to spend the newly created currency FIRST, before its full expansionary effect is felt.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
Some early nsdap had a concept on how to break free from all this but they were pushed aside because Germany needed banking connections in order to finance their re-armament and purchase raw materials abroad and so the anti-usury ideas never fully implemented...
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @raremolecule
But paradoxically the MeFo bill scheme (debt-free currency injection in NSDAP economy) was organized by Hjalmar Shacht, one of the founding members of the BIS. Schacht basically implemented Feder's program, however briefly, after he was ignored in the party.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne
My first impression from what I've read is he thought Feder was a quack and so if he implemented parts of his program it was only to please the party. Still reading about Schacht though, not positive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Schacht is a mystery, possibly another Jan Smuts for London at the Reichsbank
-
-
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne
im reading a 1938 contemporary account that i think sheds a lot of light on him, oddly little known book called the house that h8tler built, by an australian academic with a german mother, who attended some rallies
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.