making false attributions, equivocating, shifting goalposts and every other rhetorical trick. The issue doesn't need to be complicated: I said CoC may not be a watertight thesis but it does show that 20th C morally subversive intellectual movements have largely been jewish.. 2/
-
-
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne @KANTBOT20K and
Kantbot goes on to make a few claims: that jews didn't invent these ideas, that the methodology is bunk, that it's a post hoc rationalization, that internationalization was austrian not marxian, and so on and so forth. Therefore, thoroughly all of MacDonald's thesis is invalid.3/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne @KANTBOT20K and
Firstly, the ideas' authorship is irrelevant. Secondly, the methodology is simply tracing shifts in western consciousness in the 20th C: from fidelity, patriotism, faith and self-confidence to liberation, decontextualized sense of justice, anti-theism and self-scrutiny. 4/
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne @KANTBOT20K and
The shifts in all of these feelings can be traced to intellectual movements which serve as the pivot and, as it turns out, the leaders of these movements have been jewish. This isn't a false attribution or scapegoating or prejudice or anything else. 5/
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne @KANTBOT20K and
Psychoanalysis and feminism led to atheism and sexual liberation, anthropology led to cultural relativism, and the frankfurt school led to societal existentialism. There's no need to kick against the pricks. 6/
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne @KANTBOT20K and
Thirdly, globalism as the fulfilled promise of Austrianism... well the prophets of neoliberalism (Mises, Friedman, Rand) were jews and Hayek a self-proclaimed philo-semite. But that's neither here nor there because neither I nor MacDonald are denying that 7/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne @KANTBOT20K and
Neoliberalism as repackaged austrian econ delivered the material terms of internationalization where previous intellectual movements in different fields brought, or attempted to bring, the changes in consciousness, in immaterial terms, of internationalization. 8/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jargoeauxgne @KANTBOT20K and
The point at the beginning was: MacDonald isn't 100% right but there's a lot there, which you followed up with poking holes in your own strawmen and fleeing victoriously after a single shot. That mode of argument is highly suspect
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There's "a lot there" to literally any piece of writing. Nothing is 100% wrong in every way-- that would actually be an interesting experiment in prose... The things you've taken from CoC are vague & meaningless when brought into larger discussion of history. This is the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus @Jargoeauxgne and
You look at intellectual causality the same way "research trees" work in games like Civilization-- it's a laughable theory. "The Jews researched Freudianism with their Treachery points & brought Europa's Christian Purity points down by 50"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But the popularization of Freud's works did change the way people think, did they not?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.