Culture of Critique is a materialist work that applies Marx’s Theory of Ideology to left wing theory, which it accuses of being Materialist propaganda, which then, consequently makes Culture of Critique part of the Culture of Critique.
-
making false attributions, equivocating, shifting goalposts and every other rhetorical trick. The issue doesn't need to be complicated: I said CoC may not be a watertight thesis but it does show that 20th C morally subversive intellectual movements have largely been jewish.. 2/
Kantbot goes on to make a few claims: that jews didn't invent these ideas, that the methodology is bunk, that it's a post hoc rationalization, that internationalization was austrian not marxian, and so on and so forth. Therefore, thoroughly all of MacDonald's thesis is invalid.3/
-
-
Firstly, the ideas' authorship is irrelevant. Secondly, the methodology is simply tracing shifts in western consciousness in the 20th C: from fidelity, patriotism, faith and self-confidence to liberation, decontextualized sense of justice, anti-theism and self-scrutiny. 4/
-
The shifts in all of these feelings can be traced to intellectual movements which serve as the pivot and, as it turns out, the leaders of these movements have been jewish. This isn't a false attribution or scapegoating or prejudice or anything else. 5/
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.