I made this post some of you might find interesting - it is on Marx, Nietzsche, the state, the relation of the inhabitants of a land to each other, necessity of arming the populace: https://salo-forum.com/index.php?threads/marxism-nationalism.8565/ …
-
Thank you but explaining what doesn't make sense helps
What I glean is that it's important for the people to be armed, I feel you're probably making a more sophisticated point but I can't see. Armedness/Disarmedness are ontological states, the unarmed are a different being vis a vis the State? How does this loop back to lbr & prdctn?
-
-
Check post I just made, see if that clears it up. Thank you for reading it. Just hard to get good criticism so I'm not sure sure how to improve on my stuff, but have got some just now
-
Aah OK, I might be getting there. But isn't this question, or critique of Marx, if it is one, itself invalidated by the premise of a state that's both strong and pro-2A?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.