The 20-page draft, dated January 21, omits a mention included in an earlier version that, building on Europe’s existing privacy laws, a “future regulatory framework could go further and include a time-limited ban on the use of facial recognition technology in public spaces.”
-
-
Show this thread
-
Instead, the new version pitches “specific requirements” for “remote biometric identification systems” adding that “in case biometric data are used for mass surveillance, there must be clear criteria about which individuals should be identified”. More:https://www.politico.eu/pro/document-commission-considerations-temporary-face-recognition-ban-margrethe-vestager/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I knew my memory wasn’t entirely faulty Charlottehttps://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2012/09/your-memory-is-like-the-telephone-game …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
The highly bureaucratic ex ante assessment adequacy system (outlined on page 18) is also worthy of analysis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good work
@JanoschDelcker@LauKaya on documenting this disappointing developmentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Clearly leaving space for all those high level ethics!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neither e-privacy regulation nor GDPR is mentioned. C.C.
@PiracyByDesignThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was highly foressen. And it is dispactable and disreptful for our human rights.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.