James FallowsVerified account

@JamesFallows

Book w/ 'Our Towns: A 100,000-Mile Journey Into the Heart of America.' Views here=100% personal, not representing any institution.

Joined March 2009

Tweets

You blocked @JamesFallows

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @JamesFallows

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Jul 10

    Great American? Or Greatest American? Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Tom Hanks….

    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    4 hours ago

    I live in Bethesda and all I can say is WHAT?! The only thing Bethesda is plagued with is gourmet cupcakes and artisnal gelato.

    Undo
  3. Further in the (ongoing) “it would take only one… saga. JUST ONE GOP senator could make an enormous difference. And so far, not even one will take a stand. This is going to look bad historically, and looks pretty bad right now. Background:

    Undo
  4. Great, impassioned, tough, and IMO correct piece by , on what’s wrong with the anonymous Trump critiques 

    Undo
  5. Mentioned earlier B Woodward’s demeanor in Trump phone call: polite and respectful in tone, unyielding on substance. For another approach in questioning, here’s a sampling of verbatim Qs from Daily Caller interview w Trump.

    Undo
  6. Re-upping, because after all there are two of us…

    Undo
  7. Daily Caller itvw w Trump worth reading. Notes here: #1 “get it out of the way.” #2 true, but in a different sense. (Cf FDR New Deal leg; LBJ passing civ rights, voting rights, Medicare in first 2 years; Lincoln) #3 Trump in credibility contest w Woodward

    Undo
  8. This Tweet is unavailable.
    Undo
  9. Yes. Over the decades Woodward’s “XXX thought…” narratives have usually held up, and have been reliable indicators to people he had met with. Otherwise, how could he possibly write “Powell thought...” [re GWB], “Petraeus thought...” [re Obama], or now “Dowd thought”?

    Undo
  10. Does it seem as if a lot of younger (post-9/11) veterans are running for office this year? That’s because a lot of them are. is assembling a PAC to support them. (Latest big donor: Jeff Bezos). More here by me.

    Undo
  11. Sep 4
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Sep 4

    In that case, just make Ben Beach the entire Supreme Court.

    Undo
  13. Sep 4

    Honored to round out the , as Number 50! But there are two of us, so on average we are #25.

    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    Sep 4

    Fred Guttenberg, the father of Jamie Guttenberg who was killed in the shooting in Parkland, Fla., left, tries to shake hands with 's Supreme Court nom., Brett Kavanaugh, right, during a lunch break. Kavanaugh did not shake his hand. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Sep 4

    What you're seeing in the Woodward book is that the Cabinet essentially already activated the 25th Amendment They just didn't tell us.

    Undo
  16. Sep 4
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Sep 4

    ICYMI, the Fallows and Steve Brill attempted to convince a skeptical Fareed Zakariah that America was on the ascendency because of the energy and activity going on locally. They were right, he will be proven to be wrong to be skeptical.

    Undo
  18. Sep 4

    This recording is in its way more startling than the book excerpts. (Bob Woodward, with whom I haven’t always agreed, acquits himself very well — calm, polite, but not backing down an inch. And not truckling, which comes naturally to nearly anyone when speaking with a prez.)

    Undo
  19. Sep 4

    2/2 -No GOP member of legis branch has been willing to take personal, financial, or career risk to impose obviously necessary restraints on this executive. (Details: ) -Trump is who he is, but failed accountability is on them. /end

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Sep 4

    1/2 Stop me if you’ve heard this before: -There is a branch of govt, known as “the legislative branch,” which is Constitutionally empowered to exercise check-and-balance restraint on “the executive.” -A party, known as the GOP, controls this branch. -But ….

    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Sep 4

    Long, detailed, very good article on the trap of self-censorship for foreign academics dealing w China. Similar hassle/threat forces affect journalists, but we have more options of subject/ approach than scholars whose life work depends on access in China

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·