To understand this: the less countries emphasize manbood the less resources they have?
Gender roles developed for survival which is partly why conservatives defend them and poorer countries have stronger adherence to them.pic.twitter.com/gf3HM7tZOQ
-
-
-
The more resources a society has, the less it feels the need to emphasize manhood/masculinity. Until a crisis happens.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I’m just gonna guess that graph is bullshit
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, I found it on image search when I was looking for something to illustrate this concept. The article it's from is actually nice:http://www.artofmanliness.com/2014/04/23/why-are-we-so-conflicted-about-manhood-in-the-modern-age/ …
-
Yes poor women are famously well-represented at artofmanlinessdotcom, you chud
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where is this graph from? How the two constructs - emphasis on manhood & resources - measured? Is it from an actual cross-country study?!? Or did you just draw it? You know a graph has to be based upon data right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hard to say, no evidence of warfare and food gen plentiful no territory to defend
-
Why is it that in the entire family of apes (including even bonobos according to latest research) males are bigger and more aggressive then?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No measurement of actual data behind this. He doesn't know what he's talking about as always. He just copied it from 'art of manliness'.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.