I haven't read the article yet, so I apologize if you already answered this question in it, but is there any way the recording could be made public. A distortion of that nature seems like a pretty big deal and it would be nice to have indisputable proof.
-
Yeah, the audio quality is terrible. And of course it's possible that he would have been fired anyway! I agree PC in science is a real problem! But he also shot himself in the foot with the personal reference & a couple of other things.
Yeah agreed, English not being his first language may have also made him blunter than ideal. His results seemed novel to the audience and thus a contribution to the conference though (some of his data may be an artifact of women disproportionately taking family leave though)
-
-
Right. Also, according to this post, the citations gap he found is erased when you eliminate people who've dropped out of the field after publishing 1-2 papers (more women than men).
-
Also, seriously, claiming that there was never any sexism in physics and that Marie Curie's Nobel Prize shows any woman was welcome even if she could prove herself is pretty asinine
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.