You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Google found the #1 trait of effective teams is feeling "'safe' enough to take an interpersonal risk [...] to voice their opinions, even if it goes against the group [...] without fear of retribution or adverse impact to your reputation." 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zackfriedman/2019/01/28/google-says-the-best-teams-have-these-5-things/ …
They've actually known this for awhile and call it "psychological safety." Thus the first line of my memo: "Google’s political bias has equated the freedom from offense with psychological safety, but shaming into silence is the antithesis of psychological safety."
Google should Google cognitive dissonance.
Sounds like google is a mini fascist state on its own
"psychological safety" isn't safety. moreover, it's extremely vulnerable to concept creep and elastic/abuseable in any set of rules. anyone can say their psychological safety is threatened, with no independent way of verifying this is true. the idea is incoherent.
I see this sort of shaming regularly during group meetings at work. Culture will swallow a good strategy.
The culture for decades in our schools needs to change to bring a better culture to offices.
Finding something out and putting it into practice are obviously two very different things. 
Is it better to have 5 individuals working on the same problem from different perspectives, or 5 individuals working on the same problem from the same perspective? Is it better risk duplication of effort, or to ensconce duplication of effort?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
