It reads as suspiciously contrived to me, like planted evidence from an amateur who watches too many crime shows.
-
-
-
i dont think this is like a leaked conversation tho. if it was then yes it would be fake.. but it does read like an insider whistle blowing. ie he is saying 'we did these things' as in they work there and they saw it happen and now he is telling everyone what happened.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
this doesn't sound reliable. Corroborate it or bit it
-
It doesn't sound *un*reliable. But it can't be trusted, of course. If its author comes forward, he or she will also be fired. Without an identity, there will always be room for doubt.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Interesting. But why should we believe it is true?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This seems too mustache-twirlingly evil though to be legit
-
Don't get me wrong, I think he knows a lot about Google that he's probably an insider but he could be working for Google to spread disinformation. He knows a lot of details but seems like he's being told. He also leaves out crucial details and the psychology behind the decisions.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Watch out for that confirmation bias, James!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
this looks kind of silly and the level of verification is nonexistent
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This is so fake. Come on
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.