I support you in your free speech case. But I checked the research and you can't say anything about aptitude on either criteria as the research is based on self-reporting. The only conclusion you can make is that there is a difference in how the sexes see their own abilities.
Validation of Empathizing–Systemizing (E-S) theory of sex differences in 670K people http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/11/06/1811032115 … Remember, fetal testosterone predicts E-S http://docs.autismresearchcentre.com/papers/2006_Auyeung_fT&SQ.pdf … and E-S predicts STEM career http://mrgregoryonline.com/Studies/Billington.pdf … (both are actually better predictors than sex).
-
-
-
Yes, and I never talked about aptitude.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The association between foetal testosterone and E-S, as well as between E-S and the sexes seem well backed, but I'd like to see a larger study showing the predictive power of E-S in academic and career choices. Even better if the link is shown to be dose dependent!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well that proves it. if you are a systematizer, you believe in this kind of way of mapping people onto a set of variables. if you are an empathizer, you see mapping people onto a set of variables as a way to reduce people into generalizations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ETVPod check this out. Post the study you mentioned that pushes back on this type of research if you can. I’d like to see what people here make of it. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The 3rd link says error not found
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.