Jameel JafferOvjeren akaunt

@JameelJaffer

Director, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Formerly Deputy Legal Director, ACLU. This is my personal account.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: prosinac 2011.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JameelJaffer

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JameelJaffer

  1. Unsurprisingly, 's disdain for press freedom at home is undermining the United States' ability to promote press freedom abroad.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Social Media for Public Officials 101, a PSA from Knight First Amendment Institute

    Poništi
  3. Poništi
  4. But Bolton has options, and it seems fair to ask why he’s not taking advantage of them. (7/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. Bolton would run a real risk of criminal prosecution if he published his book before the government's prepublication review of it is complete, especially since the White House has told him that it believes the book contains significant amounts of classified info. (6/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. Another thing he could consider is a suit to force the govt to review the book quickly. He could do this today. He’d have a strong argument that time is of the essence, that the public interest in his story is extraordinary, and that delay is causing irreparable harm. (5/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. The government couldn’t prosecute him for disclosing information that wasn’t classified. And it couldn’t seize his proceeds (a la Snepp v. United States) if there weren’t proceeds to seize. (4/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. Technically he’d be required to submit even this for prepublication review, but his failure to submit wouldn’t result in much exposure. (3/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. One thing Bolton could do is release a version of his story that steers clear of anything that could plausibly be considered classified. (2/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. I want to add a couple points to this op-ed that and I have in this morning’s NYT. The Q I want to address is what Bolton could do if he wanted to get his story out quickly, rather than just preen and drum up advance sales on Amazon. (1/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. The public’s right to know shouldn’t be hostage to the discretion of unaccountable government censors whose interests are not aligned with the public’s. Which is why and have filed this suit (6/6):

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. It’s clear what reforms are needed: Prepublication review should apply to fewer people and fewer secrets. There should be narrower submission requirements, clearer review standards, enforceable deadlines, and a meaningful right of judicial review. (5/6)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. It’s not just Bolton’s rights at issue here. When the government suppresses the voices of former public servants, it inflicts a constitutional injury not just on them but on the public as well (4/6)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. The spectacle of White House censors deciding, without any real constraint, whether to permit a former official to publish a manuscript critical of the president should provoke reflection, if not alarm (3/6)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. Because of the dysfunction of the prepublication review system, what the public will get to see of John Bolton’s book is, to a disturbing extent, up to the White House to decide (2/6)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. John Bolton Faces the Censors – new from and me. A few key points… (1/6)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. There would be little risk in this. The government can’t seize the proceeds of a press conference, and it can’t prosecute a person for disclosing information that isn’t classified.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    New paper alert! with "The National Security Case for Breaking Up Big Tech," the second in our symposium essay series:

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Wondering what happens if Bolton just goes ahead and publishes his book? This piece gets it right: the government could file a lawsuit to seize his book profits, revoke his security clearance, or (if the book contains classified information) prosecute him.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    This is dishonest. As the quote in the story itself indicates, she is specifically talking about people who knowingly spread misinformation about voting sites to suppress voters. I am a free-speech purist and even I am okay with such laws as long as they're written the right way.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·