Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JameelJaffer
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JameelJaffer
-
Unsurprisingly,
@SecPompeo's disdain for press freedom at home is undermining the United States' ability to promote press freedom abroad.https://twitter.com/michelekelemen/status/1224008874958692356 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Jameel Jaffer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Social Media for Public Officials 101, a PSA from Knight First Amendment Institute https://knightcolumbia.org/content/social-media-for-public-officials-101 …
@knightcolumbiaHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
"John Bolton's Silence" -- more from
@2ramyakrishnan & me, this time for@just_securityhttps://www.justsecurity.org/68399/john-boltons-silence-here-is-how-he-could-lawfully-break-it/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
But Bolton has options, and it seems fair to ask why he’s not taking advantage of them. (7/7)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bolton would run a real risk of criminal prosecution if he published his book before the government's prepublication review of it is complete, especially since the White House has told him that it believes the book contains significant amounts of classified info. (6/7)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Another thing he could consider is a suit to force the govt to review the book quickly. He could do this today. He’d have a strong argument that time is of the essence, that the public interest in his story is extraordinary, and that delay is causing irreparable harm. (5/7)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The government couldn’t prosecute him for disclosing information that wasn’t classified. And it couldn’t seize his proceeds (a la Snepp v. United States) if there weren’t proceeds to seize. (4/7)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Technically he’d be required to submit even this for prepublication review, but his failure to submit wouldn’t result in much exposure. (3/7)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
One thing Bolton could do is release a version of his story that steers clear of anything that could plausibly be considered classified. (2/7)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I want to add a couple points to this op-ed that
@2ramyakrishnan and I have in this morning’s NYT. The Q I want to address is what Bolton could do if he wanted to get his story out quickly, rather than just preen and drum up advance sales on Amazon. (1/7)https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/opinion/trump-john-bolton-book.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The public’s right to know shouldn’t be hostage to the discretion of unaccountable government censors whose interests are not aligned with the public’s. Which is why
@knightcolumbia and@aclu have filed this suit (6/6):https://knightcolumbia.org/cases/edgar-v-maguire …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
It’s clear what reforms are needed: Prepublication review should apply to fewer people and fewer secrets. There should be narrower submission requirements, clearer review standards, enforceable deadlines, and a meaningful right of judicial review. (5/6)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
It’s not just Bolton’s rights at issue here. When the government suppresses the voices of former public servants, it inflicts a constitutional injury not just on them but on the public as well (4/6)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The spectacle of White House censors deciding, without any real constraint, whether to permit a former official to publish a manuscript critical of the president should provoke reflection, if not alarm (3/6)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Because of the dysfunction of the prepublication review system, what the public will get to see of John Bolton’s book is, to a disturbing extent, up to the White House to decide (2/6)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
John Bolton Faces the Censors – new from
@2ramyakrishnan and me. A few key points… (1/6)https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/opinion/trump-john-bolton-book.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
There would be little risk in this. The government can’t seize the proceeds of a press conference, and it can’t prosecute a person for disclosing information that isn’t classified.https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1222902941973204992 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Jameel Jaffer proslijedio/la je Tweet
New paper alert!
@GaneshSitaraman with "The National Security Case for Breaking Up Big Tech," the second in our@knightcolumbia symposium essay series:https://knightcolumbia.org/content/the-national-security-case-for-breaking-up-big-tech …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Jameel Jaffer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Wondering what happens if Bolton just goes ahead and publishes his book? This piece gets it right: the government could file a lawsuit to seize his book profits, revoke his security clearance, or (if the book contains classified information) prosecute him.https://www.justsecurity.org/68364/explainer-prepublication-review-and-how-it-applies-to-bolton/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Jameel Jaffer proslijedio/la je Tweet
This is dishonest. As the quote in the story itself indicates, she is specifically talking about people who knowingly spread misinformation about voting sites to suppress voters. I am a free-speech purist and even I am okay with such laws as long as they're written the right way.https://twitter.com/CNBC/status/1222562573696098308 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.