Jameel JafferVerifisert konto

@JameelJaffer

Director, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Formerly Deputy Legal Director, ACLU. This is my personal account.

Registrerte seg desember 2011
681 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @JameelJaffer

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@JameelJaffer.

  1. for 14 timer siden

    With , we're challenging the Trump-era rule that requires millions of visa applicants to register their social media handles with the State Department. 's explains why the case is important.

    1 svar 15 retweets 32 liker
    Angre
  2. for 20 timer siden

    This is a terrible ruling that will further insulate foreign-intelligence surveillance—and national security policy more generally—from meaningful judicial review. As says, we’re considering our options.

    Nearly 7 years ago, we sued to ensure people like you could access info without govt surveillance. Today, a US appeals court dismissed our appeal. We respectfully disagree with the decision & are considering our options. cc:
    8 retweets 17 liker
    Angre
  3. 15. sep.

    Some good work here from the

    This summer our Clinic was contacted by folks in Greensboro, GA about the public comment period at city council meetings being indefinitely shut down in response to community members' expressing their views about Greensboro City Attorney Barry Fleming. We wrote the city a letter.
    Vis denne tråden
    1 svar 14 liker
    Angre
  4. Retweetet
    15. sep.

    About to go live on to talk about our new report that documents NSO Group's Pegasus spyware that was used to hack a Saudi target thanks to a zero click Apple iMessage zero day (now patched):

    13 retweets 27 liker
    Angre
  5. Retweetet
    14. sep.

    ICYMI: Video recording of last week's Roads Not Taken: Reflections on 9/11, w/ Anthony Romero (), (), (former ), ('17 '19 , former ), and ().

    2 retweets 5 liker
    Angre
  6. 14. sep.

    If only there were some kind of legislative institution that could require platforms to share data with researchers, and bar platforms from using their terms of service to crush privacy-respecting research and journalism that serves the public interest.

    All the most damning research on Facebook's harms and screwups these days is coming from inside Facebook. Why? Because Facebook won't let anyone else have the data necessary to do this kind of research. Imagine how much more we would know if it did.
    4 svar 33 retweets 88 liker
    Angre
  7. Retweetet
    14. sep.

    Full video of discussion on advocacy in post-9/11 era with: · Anthony Romero () · () · (former ) · ('17 '19 , former ) · ()

    5 retweets 14 liker
    Angre
  8. 14. sep.

    Or, as Ben Wizner and I wrote thirteen (!) years ago:

    11 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  9. 14. sep.

    The way forward has been clear for two decades, as suggests: Either charge the men with crimes or release them. If the evidence isn't reliable enough to serve as a basis for trial, it's not reliable enough to serve as a basis for imprisonment without trial, either.

    Time for the Biden Administration to make some hard calls in the legal forever war, too.
    1 svar 5 retweets 19 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  10. Retweetet
    13. sep.

    A few amazing opportunities here to get to work with at . I was lucky enough to get the chance to learn from Catherine when I was at the ACLU, and there's not a more thoughtful and generous mentor in public-interest law. Apply while you can!

    Check out the new logo for the . And hiring going on here for THREE positions: two fellowships () and one more senior role (). A great opportunity to work on tech issues in the public interest!
    7 retweets 13 liker
    Angre
  11. 13. sep.

    But those inclined to insist that Facebook apply the same rules to political officials/candidates as it does to everyone else should pause to consider the political power this places in the hands of Facebook.

    2 svar 4 retweets 9 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  12. 13. sep.

    Again, this is NOT a defense of Facebook’s system, which appears to be highly arbitrary and (surprise!) motivated by narrow business considerations, not democratic ones.

    1 svar 7 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  13. 13. sep.

    This is basically what we () said in a comment to the oversight board a few months ago.

    1 svar 1 retweet 3 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  14. 13. sep.

    When Facebook takes down the speech of public officials/candidates, it intrudes very directly into the democratic process. That doesn’t mean it should never do it. But it would be good if it did it as little as possible.

    1 svar 1 retweet 5 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  15. 13. sep.

    it’s not at all obvious to me that Facebook should apply the same rules to public officials—and candidates for public office—as it does to everyone else.

    1 svar 6 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  16. 13. sep.

    This jury-rigged system of free passes for celebrities and other public figures is indefensible, for reasons made obvious in the WSJ article. If I were on the oversight board, I’d be livid. But…

    2 svar 11 retweets 30 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  17. Retweetet
    8. sep.

    When should government officials speak up? On 9/15, join us for a conversation with on the challenges public servants face in raising concerns and what needs to change, in partnership with and . Register at

    4 retweets 4 liker
    Angre
  18. Retweetet
    13. sep.

    This year I’m working with on a series of events and essays about lies and the law. Or am I?

    4 svar 12 retweets 132 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  19. Retweetet
    13. sep.

    Monday : We have dozens of questions for Congress, reporters, investigators to ask to get to bottom of what happened with U.S. in Kabul on Aug 29. cc:

    The final act of the U.S. war in Afghanistan was a drone strike in Kabul that killed 10 people. Our latest investigation shows how a man the military saw as an "imminent threat" and "ISIS facilitator" was actually an aid worker returning to his family:
    Vis denne tråden
    6 svar 26 retweets 71 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  20. Retweetet
    11. sep.

    This thread is WILD. And it is case in point against closed datasets. “It’s a great demonstration that even a little transparency can provide amazing results.” , the researcher who found the bug.

    New (w/ assist): More than three years ago, Mark Zuckerberg unveiled a plan to share Facebook data with outside researchers, so that academics could study misinformation on the site. But the data set had a major flaw.
    Vis denne tråden
    1 svar 27 retweets 83 liker
    Angre

@JameelJaffer har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·