>@MEPFuller has said something like this already but I fully concur. The Freedom Caucus’s vote to admonish @justinamash is the conclusion of a long transformation from being a purity-based conservative caucus to a protectorate for the president.
-
-
The Freedom Caucus literally couldn’t have strayed farther from their mission in admonishing
@justinamash. “Freedom” is in the groups name. Freedom — unless you criticize trump. Then your freedom is curtailed.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They never cared about borrowing restraint. They only cared about opposing Democrats. Come on, man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But the rest of us would have. They were always more anti Democrat (and especially anti black president) than principled conservative. The Freedom Caucus was always a bunch of racist, sexist white men to those of us looking from outside the bubble.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jake, Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan are nothing but nutjob conspiracy theorists who say outrageous things in hopes of getting a “fantastic guy” from Trump. It’ll be interesting to see if they get re-elected now that they’re gerrymandered GOP-safe districts will be redrawn.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was never about taxes, it was always racism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you really believe this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They would still be a group of ridiculous white men who will not accept diversity! That was their mission statement from the start, but the media gave them cover!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They never cared about anything but a hatred for Obama.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would. It happened during Clinton, went away during Bush, returned in Obama and left again for Trump. Same cycle. It’s a reaction to D Presidents not an ideology. There never has been an ideology only a window dressing. I bet you $500 it will come back for the next D President.
-
Yep..and the media will bend over backwards to grant them legitimacy
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.