that is, i wish that we could go back and make them identical, but I am more okay with diff from ruby than i am ..=
. @steveklabnik re `...` for inclusive; you cool with it being diff from Ruby? `(0..10).cover? 10 => true`; `(0...10).cover? 10 => false`
-
-
-
I don't know the history behind them, but I generally dislike exclusive ranges; they just add mental overhead
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
who even uses ruby
-
Thanks for making me do a google image search for "steve klabnik ruby tattoo"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.