It argues what whites are genetically inclined towards altruism, the purported basis of (an impossibly rosy reading of) “western civilization.” It also concludes, implicitly or otherwise, that this factor may suggest that non-whites are ill fit to participate in w. civ. 2/4
-
-
Show this thread
-
In addition to the historical lacunae that
@mccormick_ted notes, this projects onto non-Europeans the failure of Europeans to see and treat them as equals. (Doing otherwise would undermine the altruism theory.) 3/4Show this thread -
The next, missing step is to explain that Jews did not participate in these developments and so are particularly dangerous to white civilization. That gets around the thorny question of the Shoah. It becomes self-defense. This is trash, but dangerous for hiding as science. 4/4
Show this thread -
PS - by “far too kind,” did not mean in any way to criticize
@mccormick_ted’s take, which was correct and measured... I just turned up the volume. Any mistakes are mine. For example, we can’t know what any of the authors mentioned believe the implications of their work to beShow this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.