Wikipedia is edited by people with lots of free time on their hands - typically those who would be considered "unemployed" by any fair metric - and who feel the need to opine on topics they only sort-of understand. It's basically tailor-made for the modern liberal.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Along with the rest of big tech. Regulate them all.
-
Not sure that would apply here though. The company itself isn't the one doing the "curating", at least not for the most part. It's the users, many of which are absurdly left-leaning.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The founder is the last to know. Has been a disaster for 10 years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What! ... Really? ... I Never Noticed. Because, I DON'T WIKI!!! LMAO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And that's why I've been using InfoGalactic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It makes you question all historical articles on Wikipedia. Revisionists are running the site.
-
You should never trust any historical article from an unverified source. Wikipedia has its uses, but take EVERYTHING on there with a grain of salt.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Add WEBSTER's Dictionary to the list! His old unabridged Webster's is one of favorite things I inherited from my Dad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Truth