Biden was very concerned in 2005 by Bolton having done 10 unmaskings in 4 years. He could also make complete coherent sentences then.https://youtu.be/bvfxc96wqTo
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Spin is legal and common. Deception in is that it was intended to unmask Islamist terrorists contacting insurgents hiding in US and Obama perverted the process to constantly spy on our spies watching terrorists and warning Iran and Isis to dodge intel
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also Reminder: General Flynn was never asked about Russian sanctions. He talked about PNG. (See the 302) -BUT he was charged with lying abt sanctions.
Then coerced into guilty plea by threatening to go after his son, so they could hide the evidence. #ObamaGateThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And if a fake document was used to get the FISA warrant? If FBI "lost' original documents? If prosecutors knowingly lied to the courts? Is there still a set of justifications
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unmasking= legal. Leaking to the press in a desperate attempt to destroy the incoming & then current administration= felony. In his 33 years General Flynn unmasked 1 person. And I guarantee he didn't leak it to WaPo or NYT.
-
When someone is unmasked, say by someone in FBI intelligence and they provide a brief to the President, does the name of the U.S. citizen have to be protected when providing the brief to the President? Isn't the unmasking information only for the requester?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.