The judge was closely checking Roger Stone’s instagram and made social media posts a integral part of the case, devoting an entire hearing hours to it. She then took away his right to post on social media But she didnt even care what the jurors posted?https://twitter.com/RonColeman/status/1227771433268531200 …
-
-
Replying to @JackPosobiec
It is unlikely it was brought to her attention, or could have been. I have never tried a case in DC, but you get a list of veniremen (potential jurors) usually the morning of jury selection. It's a big list; your pool is many times the size of the jury. And >
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @RonColeman @JackPosobiec
> in many jurisdiction, ethical rules restrict counsel's ability to examine the social media posts of jurors. In any event, it would be very difficult to get on top of all the prospective jurors' social media in time to raise it with the court before the jury impaneled. <>
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @RonColeman
Couldn’t it have been brought up later during the trial too?
3 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @JackPosobiec
Yes. And once your jury is impaneled, you now have a much smaller group to research, of course - subject to ethical constraints...
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes
Sat thru every day of the trial
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.