Imagine a publication called "The Economist" taking the side against THE ECONOMY to own Trump.
-
-
-
I used to subscribe to these clowns years ago. Now i get calls from England every 6 months and i tell them that I’m not willing to pay for Fake News.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
A wet noodle would frighten most Republicans; I’m guessing the Democrats will B-slap the Republicans into calling wittnesses from now to next November.
-
Rand, by himself, can "procedurally" force a NAMED vote for each and every potential "witness" Any R who votes against Hunter (+) being called to testify, will be Primary'd out of office, AND THEY KNOW IT That's why the Dems will NOT actually force new witness testimony
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Look who owns that publication. Tells you all you need to know.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
And in two weeks there will be another "Bombshell" and another call for more witnesses. It will never end.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Trump defense team has laid out with definitive proof how this impeachment is unconstitutional. If allowed to go on with a vote for witnesses, then the Senate has given any future opposition Party the precedent to conduct an unconstitutionally run impeachment process forever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
