And science "journalists" make it worse. A lot of the time, if you go to the actual scientist on a subject, they're throwing caveats and disclaimers left and right -- Journobros take that and go off and write Buzzfeed-level headlines.
-
-
-
No real scientists states anything with absolute certainty. It's considered bad science. Only what there data is and what they think it might show.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Control the dialog, you control the debate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But God's handiwork does: 1 The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. 2 Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge.https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm+19%3A1-6&version=NIV …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
And models are just projections, not scientific fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And they say it for funding $$
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s a whole Fact
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Secular scientists Say “Nothing Created Everything” lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even fewer realize scientists are not infallible either! Whitehead (an aetheist philosopher) warned that science politicised would be more oppressive than religion had ever been. Beware. That's close to happening.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.